Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Author: cqfk

August undefined, 2024

WebOld 'L' EF zoom lenses vs. new RF 'non-L' primes. I recently decided to get back into photography and bought a Canon RP body. It seemed like a great price point to test the waters with the hobby again; I also really liked the small form factor for a full frame sensor. I have two lenses from a past life: an EF 24-70m, 2.8 L and a EF 70-200mm 2.8L. WebJan 11, 2016 · The RF 70-200/2.8 is my favourite major-change lens. To me, the size and weight difference over the EF is very real, and well-worth the telescoping action. Probably the RF70-200/4 is a huge improvement in usability too, but I've never shot with it. I like it even better than the RF100-500 vs the EF100-400. •••

What Is The Difference Between Canon RF and EF …

Web4. FantasticGlass • 7 mo. ago. The L series RF glass handles CA and flaring better and is a bit sharper wide open. But compared to the most modern EF glass it's actually pretty close. The biggest difference I noticed was CA, the RF L glass has basically none. It's impressive. WebEF 70-200mm f/4 vs RF 70-200mm f/4. I've been looking into getting a 70-200mm type lens for my EOS RP. If money was no object I'd probably go with the RF versions since it seems to have some slight advantages but I found some great deals that made me question whether the EF might be the way to go. The RF F/4 goes for around 1250 euros while I ... goodfellas oscar awards

EF vs RF lens construction : r/canon - reddit.com

WebNov 23, 2024 · For this purpose these lenses have been compared: Canon RF 50mm 1.2L. Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L. Canon EF 50mm 1.2L. … WebNov 23, 2024 · Specifically the 24-70mm ($600 more for RF), and the 70-200mm ($800 more). If you have existing EF lenses, I would run with those for now. I have three EF … WebOptically, the RF50/1.2 and RF85/1.2 L's are worlds better than the EF variants. They are much faster in AF speed and their sharpness when shot wide-open is unreal. Whether that's worth it to you or not, that's up to you to decide, but for someone that values these aspects, it is very much worth it. 19 MintyMarlfox • 3 yr. ago health services technology jobs

r/canon on Reddit: Is the RF 24-105 f4L IS USM worth the price over the ...

r/canon on Reddit: Do you lose quality when using EF (DSLR) lenses …

WebMost Canon EF lenses should work fine or better on the R6. Some exceptions do exist, impacting AF coverage and / or fps. With 3rd party lenses there is a higher risk of the same issues occurring, especially with older ones that can't be updated - some of them use lens ids that Canon used for lenses that don' t perform well on the R series. WebJun 6, 2024 · The Canon RF 50mm f/1.2L USM lens - an optical masterpiece. Neat 6 minutes video by BorrowLenses telling differences between Canon’s RF mount for mirrorless cameras and EF mount for … health services \u0026 benefit administratorsWebThe RF 24-105 f4 is larger and heavier, but optically superior, aside from the constant f4 maximum aperture. It is weather sealed and has both a control and focus ring. The RF 24-105 f4-7.1 is small and light and forms a very small fullframe package combined with the RP. The tradeoffs of the f4-7.1 are: health services \u0026 benefit administrators inc

"" - Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

Canon ef vs rf lenses reddit

RF 35mm 1.8 vs RF 16mm 2.8? : r/canon - reddit.com

WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive … WebCanon and Sony prices are comparable for similar quality but Sony does have far more lower-end lenses, plus third-party lenses. Both systems adapt EF lenses well (use the Sigma MC-11 for Sony). Canon has some unique RF lenses that might push you to them. The 70-200 f2.8 is VERY compact.

Did you know?

WebRF lenses have to be placed much closer to the sensor than EF, so if you have a mirrorless RF body you can adapt EF lenses to it, but there's no way to do this in reverse (you'd have to somehow jam the lenses almost an extra inch into your camera.) 3 kickstand • 21 days ago EF or EF-S lenses only. Not RF, not EF-M, not the old Canon FD. 2 WebIt's going to take a long time before Canon will be fully transitioned from EF to RF and because of that, Canon has announced a hand-full of EF-RF mount adapters for using …

WebHmm the specs on the 80d are decent other than crop sensor. I think the RP is a good step up - but only if it’s cos you don’t want to spend a few extra $ on the R. If you want a rugged body the canon rp is perhaps not the way to go. I played with one at the canon gallery in Osaka Japan last week. WebWelcome to reddit's home for discussion of the Canon EF, EF-S, EF-M, and RF Mount interchangeable lens DSLR and Mirrorless cameras, and occasionally their point-and-shoot cousins. All questions and photographic experience levels welcome!

WebRF 35mm 1.8 vs RF 16mm 2.8? Hey everyone I'm in a debate with myself about these two lens. So I currently have a Canon EOS R with 24-105mm F4 L USM. I want to get the 35mm F1.8 for night, street, Astro, full body portraits with blurry background. It's also on sale at the moment of $300 instead of $400. My dad the other day said he wants to get ... WebThese include a 24-105 f4 L, 35 f2, 50 f1.8 and 18-135 USM. I love using the 80D/35 f2 as a walk around setup. If I trade in all my crop sensor kit to mpb.com, I should receive around £750, according to a recent quote. The cost of a second hand R6 is around £1,900 while an R7 is around £1,400 (both including ef-rf adaptor).

WebRF vs EF 24-70 2.8. I just ordered the R6. And now am looking into a buying a 24-70 2.8. I’m in debate with myself about the following choice. The RF 24-70 or the EF 24-70 ii. The second one is regularly available as second hand and gives room for another second hand lens. But the built quality of je RF is way better.

WebI currently own the EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro, EF 24-70mm f/2.8L IS II, TS-E 24mm f/3.5L, TS-E 17mm f/4L, and RF 70-200mm f/4L. I'd say that they all seem to have fairly similar build quality and construction materials. I certainly haven't noticed any dramatic differences when out shooting. health services social developmentWebWhat’s the quality difference like between the new RF lenses and the old EF lenses? Will clients likely notice the difference? 0 comments 50% Upvoted Log in or sign up to leave a comment Log In Sign Up Sort by: best no comments yet Be the first to share what you think! More posts from the canon community 291 Posted by u/ImaHazardtoSociety health services transportationWebAll three have Image Stabilization, including the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS USM and Canon RF 24-70mm F2.8L IS USM, where the corresponding EF lenses do not. "And the third lens in the trinity, the Canon RF 70 … goodfellas over the rhineWebThe EF lenses will adapt onto the R-series bodies and work the same as—if not better than—on DSLR bodies, so there's definitely nothing wrong with buying a EF version and adapting it, especially considering the price difference between EF and RF. health service stationWebReddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. ... Mostly EF L lenses at the moment using the adapter. 24-70mm 2.8L II 70-200mm 2.8L II 16-35mm 2.8L III 85mm 1.4L 50mm 1.4 ... [New … health services system san franciscoWebJan 11, 2016 · EF traditionally had both types of zoom operation. All of the big white RF models so far are extending zooms: RF 70-200/2.8 RF 70-200/4 RF 100-500/4.5-7.1 … health service strikes northern irelandWebEF lenses are designed for Canon's DSLR cameras, while RF lenses are specifically created for Canon's mirrorless cameras. RF lenses have a larger mount diameter, which allows them to transmit more information between the lens and camera body. This means that RF lenses can offer faster autofocus and better image stabilization. goodfellas painting